I have long wondered about the palaces and landscapes of Indian miniatures, redolent of a beauty similar to that of a lucid dream whose landscape one is sure one has seen before. Whether these pictures were mythical or purely a product of the painter's imagination, I did not know. As a child, I spent a year or two at Basohli (of the Basohli paintings fame), but then its palace was in ruins, overgrown with weeds, and ugly tenements crowded the open spaces beyond it.
If there was something in the collective memory related to these palaces, modern structures that one normally came across in the cities did not betray it. The hallmarks of the public architecture of contemporary India are dreariness and ugliness. The Development Authorities of the various cities have used wretched designs, which, repeated thousand-fold without the slightest imagination, have turned housing projects into slums. Worse than mere eye-sores, they will assault the spirit for generations to come.
I found proof that there exists a thread connecting the past of the paintings to our own times in -- of all the places -- America. This was in a trip to Barsana Dham in Austin, a place of which I had heard much good things for years, but somehow never managed to visit. The estate has a palace, a medieval haveli, with beautiful gardens and dancing peacocks and peahens with chicks in tow -- a recreation of the Barsana Dham of Vraja, the mythical meeting place of Krishna and Radha. Behind the palace-temple is a pond, a small replica of the Govardhan Hill, and further in the background is a large hill, from the top of which one can see the wide expanse of the Austin valley.
On inquiry at the office, I was told that this conception was not an original and similar palace temples exist in India. But they are in smaller towns, off the beaten path, which I don't get an opportunity to tread in my hurried trips.
Barsana Dham has great conference and residence facilities, and I was there to speak to a national meeting of the Hindu Students Council of America. The organizers had put together several great sessions on contemporary issues ranging from movies, current affairs, art, dance and improvised theater. I also heard two brilliant lectures: one by Professor Sen Pathak of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston on genetics, and another by Prabhakari Devi, the resident American Swamini, on the hidden Dharma of people's lives.
Other highpoints of the conference were the hikes to the top of the hill, a very, very wild Holi with a fire-engine spraying the participants, and garba and bhangra dance performances late at night in the open columned arena next to the pond. In the night lights, the place looked like a shining city upon a hill.
The Chemist and the Grammarian
Solid state electronics, which has revolutionized modern life, arises from the unique properties of silicon and germanium in that their electrical properties change dramatically when substituted atoms are introduced in their crystal lattices. Another widely used solid state material is gallium, which is used in light emitting diodes and other devices.
It is an amusing sidelight of history of chemistry that the original names of gallium and germanium were Eka-aluminum and Eka-silicon, where eka, Sanskrit for one, was used by Mendeleev, the famed formulator of the Periodic Table of elements, as representing beyond. He predicted the existence of these elements in a paper in 1869, and it was the identification of these elements in 1875 and 1886 that made him famous, and led to the general acceptance of his Periodic Table.
There are a couple of theories about why Mendeleev, a Russian from St. Petersburg, used a Sanskrit prefix. According to Professor Paul Kiparsky of Stanford University, Mendeleev was a friend and colleague of the Sanskritist Bohtlingk, who was preparing the second edition of his book on Panini at about this time, and Mendeleev wished to honour Panini with his nomenclature. Noting that there are striking similarities between the Periodic Table and the introductory Shiva Sutras in Panini's grammar, Kiparsky says:
[T]he analogies between the two systems are striking. Just as Panini found that the phonological patterning of sounds in the language is a function of their articulatory properties, so Mendeleev found that the chemical properties of elements are a function of their atomic weights. Like Panini, Mendeleev arrived at his discovery through a search for the "grammar" of the elements (using what he called the principle of isomorphism, and looking for general formulas to generate the possible chemical compounds). Just as Panini arranged the sounds in order of increasing phonetic complexity (e.g. with the simple stops k, p... preceding the other stops, and representing all of them in expressions like kU, pU) so Mendeleev arranged the elements in order of increasing atomic weights, and called the first row (oxygen, nitrogen, carbon etc.) "typical (or representative) elements.” Just as Panini broke the phonetic parallelism of sounds when the simplicity of the system required it, e.g. putting the velar to the right of the labial in the nasal row, so Mendeleev gave priority to isomorphism over atomic weights when they conflicted, e.g. putting beryllium in the magnesium family because it patterns with it even though, by atomic weight, it seemed to belong with nitrogen and phosphorus. In both cases, the periodicities they discovered would later be explained by a theory of the internal structure of the elements.
Another possibility is that it wasn't Panini's Shiva Sutras that influenced him, but rather the two-dimensional arrangement of the Sanskrit varnamala. The tabular form of the Sanskrit letters is due to the two parameters (point of articulation and aspiration) at the basis of the sounds, and Mendeleev must have recognized that ratios/valency and atomic weight likewise defined a two-dimensional basis for the elements.
Convinced that the analogy was fundamental, Mendeleev theorized that the gaps that lay in his Table must correspond to undiscovered elements. In all, he predicted eight elements, and he used the prefixes of eka, dvi and tri (Sanskrit one, two and three) in their naming.
Mendeleev, as the discoverer of the order in chemical elements, was tipping his hat to the Sanskrit grammarians of yore who had created astonishingly sophisticated theories of language based on their discovery of the two-dimensional patterns in basic sounds.
The beauty of the Sanskrit grammar is just one small point of light in the shining hill of Sanskrit sciences. Even for us moderns, who are not vitally connected to these sciences any longer, there are amazing jewels to be mined from the hill.
External Links:
http://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt.html : Mendeleev's predicted elements
http://www.ece.lsu.edu/kak/siva-t1.pdf : Professor Kiparsky on the Shiva Sutras
Close
My family, especially my mother, used to be part of the International Society of Divine Love, the people who run Barsana Dham. We were members for a few years, and attended satsangs frequently. But they're very shady. Supposedly, the family who hosted the satsangs, a member of ISDL, we're approached(specifically their younger devout daughers, barely teenagers) by the sanyasi's or Swami in a sexual manner. This has happened to another family as well. My mom told me this, as she is good friends with both families. I think they are being sued right now, but I just thought I would throw that out there. It's sad, espcecially because I learned alot from the many lectures I attended when I was a kid. Just beware. I wish this wasn't true, but it is, as we are very close with those afflicted. Dr. Kak, I am a big fan of your work, thanks so much.
Reply | | Report Abuse
T Arasu must be one of the DMK tamilakam types. He might probably refer to all of us as (H)indians. Ignore him.
sri
Reply | | Report Abuse
Tarasu, the fact that you are unaware of the difference between Manohar Joshi and Murli Manohar Joshi (a matter of very recent past) testifies how ignorant you can be about Sanskrit and Ancient Indic Pride (matters of very distant past). Try updating your observations- it will help you and your kids as well.
Reply | | Report Abuse
What is wrong in the "above sort of article", Tarasu? Have you ever given a thought to the striking resemblence of the 2-dimensional nature of the Periodic Table and the Indian (Devanagri-related) "barNamALA"? Why it stinks you when an astounding piece of information is unfolded? What is wrong if your kids learn how Panini indirectly influenced Mendeleev? What is wrong in re-establishing all good that India once achieved? What is wrong in saying that Sushruta was the first to do plastic surgery or that Aryabhatta was the first to oppose geocentrism favouring heleocentrism (where unduly the credit goes to Coppernicus)? Why should it stink you when any pride of India is re-discovered? What kind of mental frame do you have for the National Pride?
Reply | | Report Abuse
Times have changed for good, Manohar Joshi cronies are out. Thank god other wise our kids would have endeded studying the above sort of articles for text books.
Reply | | Report Abuse
I hope this will also encourage people in Texas to visit Barsana Dham.
Reply | | Report Abuse
Excellent! Very informative!
Reply | | Report Abuse
A great piece of work!
Reply | | Report Abuse
A very informative write-up.
Thanks to the author.
Reply | | Report Abuse
Very interesting article, Dr. Kak!
Pity we dont learn such stuff at school. Similarly, after having been drilled thorughout school about Roman & "Arabic" numerals, I was pleasantly surprised to find that even Encyclopedia Brittanica refers to them as Hindu-Arabic numerals. Al-Khwarismi, the arabic mathematician who introduced Indian Math to the western world wrote an entire paper on this called "On the Hindu numbers", which was translated into Latin as "De numero indorum". This was how Europeans got introduced to the place-value system. (Incidentally, "Algorithm" comes from the latin version of Al-Khwarismi). Many math papers attribute such high sophistication of Indian math to the rigorous needs of astronomy & cosmology that made Indians work comfortably work with very huge numerical quantities.
The sad thing (abt this article & the wikipedia encyclopedia Jayant brought up) is that these are only read by NRIs and the privileged few in India. Such matter should be included in our textbooks to make the sciences more readable, entertaining & relevant. (I am not going to comment on how impossible it seems in the current climate - I want to keep the discussion on track.)
BTW, most american textbooks have small sections that talk about such interesting tid-bits, life-stories of scientists etc. If we had such sections in our math, physics, chemistry books etc, it would make these textbooks more interesting.
Regards,
Advaithan
Reply | | Report Abuse
- 1
- 2
Displaying 1 - 10 of 15 Blog Comments